On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 05:34:27PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> The currently processing cpdma descriptor with EOQ flag set may
> contain two values in Next Descriptor Pointer field:
> - valid pointer: means CPDMA missed addition of new desc in queue;
It shouldn't happen in normal circumstances, right?
So, why it happens only for egress channels? And Does that mean
there is some resynchronization between submit and process function,
or this is h/w issue?
> - null: no more descriptors in queue.
> In the later case, it's not required to write to HDP register, but now
> CPDMA does it.
>
> Hence, add additional check for Next Descriptor Pointer != null in
> cpdma_chan_process() function before writing in HDP register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
> index 0924014..379314f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
> @@ -1152,7 +1152,7 @@ static int __cpdma_chan_process(struct cpdma_chan *chan)
> chan->count--;
> chan->stats.good_dequeue++;
>
> - if (status & CPDMA_DESC_EOQ) {
> + if ((status & CPDMA_DESC_EOQ) && chan->head) {
> chan->stats.requeue++;
> chan_write(chan, hdp, desc_phys(pool, chan->head));
> }
> --
> 2.10.1
>
