On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:59:09PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 23:40 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > > > Fair enough, I have no objections to the patch. > > An additional question is about PATH_MAX : > > Is it guaranteed to stay at 4096 forever ? > > To be safe, maybe we should use a constant of our own.
Right, this reminds me we have to fix something else. So constant of our own plus something smaller, if possible, would be good to go. Thanks.
