On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2016-12-09 11:49, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > On 2016-11-29 23:52, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>> > I tried a quick compile attempt on the test case (I assume it is a
>> > socket fuzzer) and get the following compile error:
>> > cc -g -O0 -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -o socket_fuzz socket_fuzz.c
>> > socket_fuzz.c:16:1: warning: "_GNU_SOURCE" redefined
>> > <command-line>: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
>> > socket_fuzz.c: In function ‘segv_handler’:
>> > socket_fuzz.c:89: warning: implicit declaration of function 
>> > ‘__atomic_load_n’
>> > socket_fuzz.c:89: error: ‘__ATOMIC_RELAXED’ undeclared (first use in this 
>> > function)
>> > socket_fuzz.c:89: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>> > socket_fuzz.c:89: error: for each function it appears in.)
>> > socket_fuzz.c: In function ‘loop’:
>> > socket_fuzz.c:280: warning: unused variable ‘errno0’
>> > socket_fuzz.c: In function ‘test’:
>> > socket_fuzz.c:303: warning: implicit declaration of function 
>> > ‘__atomic_fetch_add’
>> > socket_fuzz.c:303: error: ‘__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST’ undeclared (first use in this 
>> > function)
>> > socket_fuzz.c:303: warning: implicit declaration of function 
>> > ‘__atomic_fetch_sub’
>>
>> -std=gnu99 should help
>> ignore warnings
>
> I got a little further, left with "__ATOMIC_RELAXED undeclared", 
> "__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST
> undeclared" under gcc 4.4.7-16.
>
> gcc 4.8.2-15 leaves me with "undefined reference to `clock_gettime'"

add -lrt


> What compiler version do you recommend?

6.x sounds reasonable
4.4 branch is 7.5 years old, surprised that it does not disintegrate
into dust yet :)


>> >> - RGB
>> >
>> > - RGB
>
> - RGB
>
> --
> Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com>
> Kernel Security Engineering, Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
> Remote, Ottawa, Canada
> Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

Reply via email to