On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:41 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
> But one thing I am against is changing the driver name for existing > users. If an existing chip is supported by the stmmac driver for > existing users, they should still continue to use the "stmmac" driver. > > Therefore, if consolidation changes the driver module name for > existing users, then that is not a good plan at all. You have at least one supporter here. Though I jumped in to the discussion very late, not sure if everyone have time to answer to that. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
