On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 12:31:56PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2016年12月06日 23:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > These fields are 64 bit, using le32_to_cpu and friends
> > on these will not do the right thing.
> > Fix this up.
> > 
> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 14 +++++++-------
> >   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c 
> > b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > index 6120384..22e99c4 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > @@ -606,9 +606,9 @@ static int virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(struct 
> > virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
> >             return 0;
> >     pkt = virtio_transport_alloc_pkt(&info, 0,
> > -                                    le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid),
> > +                                    le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid),
> >                                      le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_port),
> > -                                    le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> > +                                    le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> >                                      le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_port));
> 
> Looking at sockaddr_vm, svm_cid is "unsigned int", do we really want 64 bit
> here?

Can't change the protocol at this point.


> >     if (!pkt)
> >             return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ virtio_transport_send_response(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> >     struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info info = {
> >             .op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RESPONSE,
> >             .type = VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM,
> > -           .remote_cid = le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> > +           .remote_cid = le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> >             .remote_port = le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_port),
> >             .reply = true,
> >     };
> > @@ -863,9 +863,9 @@ virtio_transport_recv_listen(struct sock *sk, struct 
> > virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
> >     child->sk_state = SS_CONNECTED;
> >     vchild = vsock_sk(child);
> > -   vsock_addr_init(&vchild->local_addr, le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid),
> > +   vsock_addr_init(&vchild->local_addr, le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid),
> >                     le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_port));
> > -   vsock_addr_init(&vchild->remote_addr, le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> > +   vsock_addr_init(&vchild->remote_addr, le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> >                     le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_port));
> >     vsock_insert_connected(vchild);
> > @@ -904,9 +904,9 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_pkt 
> > *pkt)
> >     struct sock *sk;
> >     bool space_available;
> > -   vsock_addr_init(&src, le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> > +   vsock_addr_init(&src, le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> >                     le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_port));
> > -   vsock_addr_init(&dst, le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid),
> > +   vsock_addr_init(&dst, le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid),
> >                     le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_port));
> >     trace_virtio_transport_recv_pkt(src.svm_cid, src.svm_port,

Reply via email to