> On Dec 8, 2016, at 6:12 PM, Peng Tao <bergw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Otherwise we'll leave the packets queued until releasing vsock device.
> E.g., if guest is slow to start up, resulting ETIMEDOUT on connect, guest
> will get the connect requests from failed host sockets.
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergw...@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> index 8a398b3..c73b03a 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> @@ -1101,10 +1101,19 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_dgram_ops = {
> .sendpage = sock_no_sendpage,
> };
>
> +static int vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> +{
> + if (!transport->cancel_pkt)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + return transport->cancel_pkt(vsk);
> +}
> +
> static void vsock_connect_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct sock *sk;
> struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> + int cancel = 0;
>
> vsk = container_of(work, struct vsock_sock, dwork.work);
> sk = sk_vsock(vsk);
> @@ -1115,8 +1124,11 @@ static void vsock_connect_timeout(struct work_struct
> *work)
> sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
> sk->sk_err = ETIMEDOUT;
> sk->sk_error_report(sk);
> + cancel = 1;
> }
> release_sock(sk);
> + if (cancel)
> + vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
>
> sock_put(sk);
> }
> @@ -1223,11 +1235,13 @@ static int vsock_stream_connect(struct socket *sock,
> struct sockaddr *addr,
> err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
> sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
> sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
> + vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
> goto out_wait;
> } else if (timeout == 0) {
> err = -ETIMEDOUT;
> sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
> sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
> + vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
> goto out_wait;
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
This looks fine to me:
Reviewed-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhan...@vmware.com>
