From: Jiri Benc <jb...@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:30:35 +0100
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 15:41:52 -0800, Brandon Philips wrote: >> The issue we have: when creating the VXLAN interface and assigning it >> an address we see a broadcast route being added by the Kernel. For >> example if we have 10.4.0.0/16 a broadcast route to 10.4.0.0 is >> created. This route is unwanted because we assign 10.4.0.0 to one of >> our VXLAN interfaces. > > Are you saying you're trying to assign the IP address 10.4.0.0/16 as a > unicast address to an interface? Then you'll run into way more problems > than the one you're describing. You can't have host part of the IP > address consisting of all zeros (or all ones). Just don't do it. Choose > a valid IP address instead. Agreed.
