>-----Original Message-----
>From: Simon Horman [mailto:simon.hor...@netronome.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 12:43 PM
>To: Yotam Gigi <yot...@mellanox.com>
>Cc: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>; Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us>;
>netdev@vger.kernel.org; da...@davemloft.net; Ido Schimmel
><ido...@mellanox.com>; Elad Raz <el...@mellanox.com>; Nogah Frankel
><nog...@mellanox.com>; Or Gerlitz <orl...@mellanox.com>;
>j...@mojatatu.com; geert+rene...@glider.be; step...@networkplumber.org;
>xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com; li...@roeck-us.net; john.fastab...@gmail.com
>Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 5/8] Introduce sample tc action
>
>On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:26:44PM +0000, Yotam Gigi wrote:
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Roopa Prabhu [mailto:ro...@cumulusnetworks.com]
>> >Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:15 PM
>> >To: Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us>
>> >Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; da...@davemloft.net; Yotam Gigi
>> ><yot...@mellanox.com>; Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>; Elad Raz
>> ><el...@mellanox.com>; Nogah Frankel <nog...@mellanox.com>; Or Gerlitz
>> ><ogerl...@mellanox.com>; j...@mojatatu.com; geert+rene...@glider.be;
>> >step...@networkplumber.org; xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com; linux@roeck-
>us.net;
>> >john.fastab...@gmail.com; simon.hor...@netronome.com
>> >Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 5/8] Introduce sample tc action
>> >
>> >On 11/14/16, 7:00 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> From: Yotam Gigi <yot...@mellanox.com>
>> >>
>> >> This action allow the user to sample traffic matched by tc classifier.
>> >> The sampling consists of choosing packets randomly, truncating them,
>> >> adding some informative metadata regarding the interface and the original
>> >> packet size and mark them with specific mark, to allow further tc rules to
>> >> match and process. The marked sample packets are then injected into the
>> >> device ingress qdisc using netif_receive_skb.
>> >>
>> >> The packets metadata is packed using the ife encapsulation protocol, and
>> >> the outer packet's ethernet dest, source and eth_type, along with the
>> >> rate, mark and the optional truncation size can be configured from
>> >> userspace.
>> >>
>> >> Example:
>> >> To sample ingress traffic from interface eth1, and redirect the sampled
>> >> the sampled packets to interface dummy0, one may use the commands:
>> >>
>> >> tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle ffff: ingress
>> >>
>> >> tc filter add dev eth1 parent ffff: \
>> >>      matchall action sample rate 12 mark 17
>> >
>> >Yotham, I am guessing in the future if one does not want to use mark,
>> >the sample api is extensible to allow for other actions to be added.
>> >This is from the general concern we had on using mark: some may not want to
>use
>> >mark.
>> >As long as the api is extensible to allow an alternate way in the future,
>> > we should be good. (We would prefer to not go down the path of having to
>> >introduce
>> >a new  'action sample' if this limits us in some way).
>>
>> The code is extensible  - if one does want to add another action to sample, 
>> he
>> totally can :)
>>
>> By the way, one of the reasons we removed the patches for now is that we
>> consider adding mirroring functionality to it instead of heaving two 
>> tc-rules.
>
>Hi Yotham,
>
>I see that this action combines several discrete sub-actions, some of which
>duplicate functionality present in existing actions:
>
>* sample
>* truncate
>* IFE encapsulation with metadata
>* mark
>* output (proposed)
>
>I wonder if it would make sense to provided a mechanism whereby sampled
>packets can be passed on to other actions. Something similar to the
>existing pipe mechanism but allowing for the sampled and the original packets
>to continue to be processed separately.
>
>If so, it may be worth white-listing actions for which sampled packets are
>known to work well to limit the scope for unforseen side effects.

Hi Simon,

The patches were removed and we intend to propose a different implementation for
that, using a dedicated sampling netlink channel, thus removing the need to
mark, mirror and IFE-pack the packets.

We intend to send in the next few weeks, so I guess you can comment on the new
version.

Thanks!

Reply via email to