From: Leon Romanovsky <leo...@mellanox.com> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:06:09 +0200
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:07:31PM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> From: Eli Cohen <e...@dev.mellanox.co.il> >> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:03:18 -0600 >> >> > If necessary I can make sure it builds on 32 bits as well. >> >> Please do. > > Dave, > > I'm failing to understand the benefits of building mlx5 on 32 bits, and > see only disadvantages: > * It is actual dead code without test coverage. > * It misleads reviewers/customers by seeing code for 32 bits. > * It adds compilation time for 32 bits platforms and "punishes" them > for not relevant for them driver. > > Why do you call removing all that as a "regression"? We have this thing called "CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST", it has tons of value, perhaps you've seen it before?
