On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 16:56 -0400, jamal wrote: > On Thu, 2006-22-06 at 15:40 -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 15:43 -0400, jamal wrote: > > > > > > No - what these 2 gents are saying was these events and infrastructure > > > already exist. > > > > Notification of the exact events needed does not exist today. > > > > Ok, so you cant event make use of anything that already exists? > Or is a subset of what you need already there? > > > The key events, again, are: > > > > - the neighbour entry mac address has changed. > > > > > > - the next hop ip address (ie the neighbour) for a given dst_entry has > > changed. > > > I dont see a difference for the above two from an L2 perspective. > Are you keeping track of IP addresses?
There is no difference from an L2 perspective, but the RDMA driver needs notification of each so it can correctly manipulate the L2 table in HW and/or control block for the affected active connections. > You didn't answer my question in the previous email as to what RDMA > needs to keep track of in hardware. > See my previous email. To reiterate: The HW I'm working on maintains a L2 table, and each active RDMA connection keeps an index into this table . If the mac addr of the next hop changes, then the L2 Table gets updated. If the next hop itself changes, then each active connection must be kicked to update its index into the L2 table. > > > > - the path mtu for a given dst_entry has changed. > > > > Same with this. > The RDMA HW needs the path mtu for each connection in order to do segmentation. Steve. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
