On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 13:21 -0700, Andrew Collins wrote: > > Any interest in me spinning a real patch for this? I agree that it'd be > better > if we were guaranteed to get a pre-encryption flow hash for any IPsec traffic, > but in my particular case I don't care, as I control the HW and can make it > give > me a hash. :)
You certainly can send this as a patch of its own. The pre-encryption flow hash would be a separate patch and is not a prereq. Thanks.
