From: Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 21:22:53 -0800
> In principle I agree, but as I previously wrote backporting this > driver is already a bear. We need to do something here as this is > quickly approaching being infeasible to backport. Even if we don't > restructure the directories I'd still like to see some effort towards > feature modularization and isolation. There simply is a lot changing all the time, no restructuring is going to reduce that. The driver simply gets a lot of churn. Backporting such things through a bunch of file and/or directory renames is seriously nothing but asking for more punishment. That's why I am against it.
