On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:15:21 +0100
Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]> wrote:

> This patch adds a new field that is printed in the end of the line which
> denotes the real entry state. Before this patch an entry's IIF could
> disappear and it would look like an unresolved one (iif = unresolved):
> (3.0.16.1, 225.11.16.1)          Iif: unresolved
> with no way to really distinguish it from an unresolved entry.
> After the patch if the dumped entry has RTNH_F_UNRESOLVED set we get:
> (3.0.16.1, 225.11.16.1)          Iif: unresolved  State: unresolved
> for unresolved entries and:
> (0.0.0.0, 225.11.11.11)          Iif: eth4       Oifs: eth3  State: resolved
> for resolved entries after the OIF list. Note that "State:" has ':' in
> it so it cannot be mistaken for an interface name.
> 
> And for the example above, we'd get:
> (0.0.0.0, 225.11.11.11)          Iif: unresolved     State: resolved
> 
> Also when dumping all routes via ip route show table all, it will show
> up as:
> multicast 225.11.16.1/32 from 3.0.16.1/32 table default proto 17 unresolved
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>

Applied to net-next

Reply via email to