Hi Vivien, On sam., janv. 21 2017, Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew, > > Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> writes: > >> The internal PHYs of the mv88e6390 do not have a model ID. Trap any >> calls to the ID register, and if it is zero, return the ID for the >> mv88e6390. The Marvell PHY driver can then bind to this ID. > > This, in addition to the temperature code not working (despite what the > datasheet says) makes me wonder if this is intentional from Marvell. Do > we have a revision number for the 88E6390X's on the ZII Dev Rev C board? > > It would be interesting to ask Gregory maybe about that. This looks not > "production-ready". What I can say is that with the 88E6341, which seems to have the same issue (ie incomplete PHY ID), reading the temperature worked. Gregory > > Other than that, I have no objection on the patch itself if that is > indeed expected from them... > > Thanks, > > Vivien -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com
