Hi Wei, On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:15:34AM -0800, Wei Wang wrote: > Willy, > > Looks like you sent a separate patch on top of this patch series to address > double connect().
Yes, sorry, I wanted to reply to this thread after the git-send-email and got caught immediately after :-) So as suggested by Eric in order to make the review easier, it was done on top of your series. > Then I think this patch series should be good to go. > I will get your patch tested with our TFO test cases. I think so as well. Thanks for running the tests. On my side I could fix the haproxy bug which triggered this, and could verify the the whole series works fine both with and without the haproxy fix. So I think we're good now. Thanks, Willy