On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 07:50 +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> This patch adds a napi instance for IPsec GRO.
> With this, we handle IPsec GRO with no impact
> on the generic networking code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klass...@secunet.com>
> ---
>  net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 87 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
> index 6e3f025..c5fc12d 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,90 @@
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(xfrm_input_afinfo_lock);
>  static struct xfrm_input_afinfo __rcu *xfrm_input_afinfo[NPROTO];
>  
> +struct xfrm_napi {
> +     struct sk_buff_head     napi_skbs;
> +     struct napi_struct      napi;
> +};
> +
> +static struct xfrm_napi __percpu *napis;
> +
> +static void xfrm_gro_receive(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +     struct xfrm_napi *xnapi;
> +     struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
> +
> +     if (!napis || skb_cloned(skb) || !(dev->features & NETIF_F_GRO)) {
> +             netif_rx(skb);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     xnapi = this_cpu_ptr(napis);
> +
> +     if (skb_queue_len(&xnapi->napi_skbs) > netdev_max_backlog) {
> +             atomic_long_inc(&dev->rx_dropped);
> +             kfree_skb(skb);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     __skb_queue_tail(&xnapi->napi_skbs, skb);
> +     if (skb_queue_len(&xnapi->napi_skbs) == 1)
> +             napi_schedule(&xnapi->napi);
> +}
> +
> +static int xfrm_gro_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> +{
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +     struct sk_buff *skb;
> +     int work_done = 0;
> +     struct xfrm_napi *xnapi = container_of(napi, struct xfrm_napi, napi);
> +
> +     while (work_done < budget) {
> +             skb = __skb_dequeue(&xnapi->napi_skbs);
> +             if (!skb)
> +                     break;
> +             napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
> +             work_done++;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (work_done < budget) {
> +             napi_gro_flush(napi, false);
> +
> +             if (likely(list_empty(&napi->poll_list))) {
> +                     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_and_clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, 
> &napi->state));
> +             } else {
> +                     /* If n->poll_list is not empty, we need to mask irqs */
> +                     local_irq_save(flags);
> +                     __napi_complete(napi);
> +                     local_irq_restore(flags);
> +             }
> +     }


The following should work and contain less copy/pasted code.

          if (work_done < budget)
               napi_complete(napi);


> +
> +     return work_done;
> +}
> +
> +static void xfrm_gro_init(void)
> +{
> +     int i;
> +
> +     /* Napi remains disabled if we can't alloc memory. */
> +     napis = alloc_percpu(struct xfrm_napi);

napis can be NULL here.

> +
> +     for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> +             struct xfrm_napi *xnapi = per_cpu_ptr(napis, i);
> +
> +             __skb_queue_head_init(&xnapi->napi_skbs);
> +
> +             set_bit(NAPI_STATE_NO_BUSY_POLL, &xnapi->napi.state);
> +
> +             INIT_LIST_HEAD(&xnapi->napi.poll_list);
> +             xnapi->napi.poll = xfrm_gro_poll;
> +             xnapi->napi.weight = 64;
> +             xnapi->napi.gro_list = NULL;
> +             xnapi->napi.gro_count = 0;
> +             xnapi->napi.skb = NULL;
> +     }
> +}


Alternative would be to use a 

static struct net_device xfrm_napi_anchor_device;

and use gro_cell


I will present in next netdev conference a work based on NAPI,
and having less hand coded napi logic will help a lot.

Thanks.


Reply via email to