Andrey Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> A general pattern that happens in cleanups is the discovery >> that code using an old interface in a problematic way really >> could be done much better another way. I didn't dig enough >> to see if that was the case in any of the code that you changed. > > Well, there is obvious improvement of this kind: many protocols walk over > device list to find devices with non-NULL protocol specific pointers. > For example, IPv6, decnet and others do it on module unloading to clean up. > Those places just ask for some simpler standard way of doing it, but I wasn't > bold enough for such radical change. > Do you think I should try?
It probably makes sense to asses that after the patches are split up. Unless you run into something obvious. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
