On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Yuval Mintz wrote:
> +static int qed_ptp_hw_adjfreq(struct qed_dev *cdev, s32 ppb)
> +{
> +     struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn = QED_LEADING_HWFN(cdev);
> +     struct qed_ptt *p_ptt = p_hwfn->p_ptp_ptt;
> +     int drift_dir, best_val, best_period;
> +     s64 period, dif, dif2;
> +     u32 drift_ctr_cfg = 0;
> +     s64 best_dif, val;
> +     u32 drift_state;
> +
> +     best_dif = ppb;
> +     best_period = 2;
> +     best_val = 0;
> +     drift_dir = 1;
> +
> +     if (ppb < 0) {
> +             ppb = -ppb;
> +             drift_dir = 0;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (ppb == 0) {
> +             /* No clock adjustment required */
> +             best_val = 0;
> +             best_period = 0xFFFFFFF;
> +     } else {
> +             /* Adjustment value is up to +/-7ns, find an optimal value in
> +              * this range.
> +              */
> +             for (val = 7; val > 0; val++) {

This is an endless loop. ------------- ^^^^^

Besides that, this code returns some very strange values.  For
example, for ppb = 100106, 100107, and 100108.  Also ppb = 1...8
all return 0/40.

Trouble with the -= 8?

I can only recommend plotting all of the raw errors and also average
(RMS) error over the nominal interval ppb = 1...500000.


Thanks,
Richard

> +                     period = div_s64(val * 1000000000, ppb);
> +                     period -= 8;
> +                     period >>= 4;
> +                     if (period < 1)
> +                             period = 1;
> +                     if (period > 0xFFFFFFE)
> +                             period = 0xFFFFFFE;
> +
> +                     /* Check both rounding ends for approximate error */
> +                     dif = ppb * (period * 16 + 8) - val * 1000000000;
> +                     dif2 = dif + 16 * ppb;
> +
> +                     if (dif < 0)
> +                             dif = -dif;
> +                     if (dif2 < 0)
> +                             dif2 = -dif2;
> +                     if (dif2 < dif) {
> +                             period++;
> +                             dif = dif2;
> +                     }
> +
> +                     /* Track best approximation found so far */
> +                     if (dif < best_dif) {
> +                             best_dif = dif;
> +                             best_val = (int)val;
> +                             best_period = (int)period;
> +                     }
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     drift_ctr_cfg = (best_period << QED_DRIFT_CNTR_TIME_QUANTA_SHIFT) |
> +                     (best_val << QED_DRIFT_CNTR_ADJUSTMENT_SHIFT) |
> +                     (drift_dir << QED_DRIFT_CNTR_DIRECTION_SHIFT);
> +
> +     qed_wr(p_hwfn, p_ptt, NIG_REG_TSGEN_RST_DRIFT_CNTR, 0x1);
> +
> +     drift_state = qed_rd(p_hwfn, p_ptt, NIG_REG_TSGEN_RST_DRIFT_CNTR);
> +     if (drift_state & 1) {
> +             qed_wr(p_hwfn, p_ptt, NIG_REG_TSGEN_DRIFT_CNTR_CONF,
> +                    drift_ctr_cfg);
> +     } else {
> +             DP_INFO(p_hwfn, "Drift counter is not reset\n");
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
> +     qed_wr(p_hwfn, p_ptt, NIG_REG_TSGEN_RST_DRIFT_CNTR, 0x0);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}

Reply via email to