On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 2017年03月03日 22:39, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >> >> +void vhost_signal(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq); >> +static enum hrtimer_restart vhost_coalesce_timer(struct hrtimer *timer) >> +{ >> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = >> + container_of(timer, struct vhost_virtqueue, ctimer); >> + >> + if (mutex_trylock(&vq->mutex)) { >> + vq->coalesce_frames = vq->max_coalesce_frames; >> + vhost_signal(vq->dev, vq); >> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex); >> + } >> + >> + /* TODO: restart if lock failed and not held by handle_tx */ >> + return HRTIMER_NORESTART; >> +} >> + > > > Then we may lose an interrupt forever if no new tx request? I believe we > need e.g vhost_poll_queue() here.
Absolutely, I need to fix this. The common case for failing to grab the lock is competition with handle_tx. With careful coding we can probably avoid scheduling another run with vhost_poll_queue in the common case. Your patch v7 cancels the pending hrtimer at the start of handle_tx. I need to reintroduce that, and also only schedule a timer at the end of handle_tx, not immediately when vq->coalesce_frames becomes non-zero.