On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:54 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Andreas Schultz <aschu...@tpip.net> > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:19:16 +0100 (CET) > >> When we are talking about the xmit path, then currently none of the >> receivers we are talking to is going to be Linux and we have no >> idea how they will behave nor do we have any influence on them. Do >> we really need to make assumptions about other vendors implementations? >> >> Traces on live GRX networks show that about 90% of the SGSN/S-GW >> that would talk to us always use the default GTP-U port as source >> port. Some multi chassis GSN's seem to assign source port ranges to >> chassis, but that has nothing todo with DDOS protection. > > This is exactly what other UDP tunnel implementations did before > flow separation was prevelant. > > I don't see the point of any of this discussion discouraging the > enablement of proper flow separation.
Hi Dave, So where do we go from here? should I resubmit the patch? Or.
