On Thursday, 6 July 2006 13:15, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> First of all: 
>       You should not implemented "--vlan-target". 
>       Always return EBT_CONTINUE. That saves a lot of (duplicated) code
>       (you can express the same using some more rules) while keeping 
>       the same flexibility level. Rules for transforming/mangling 
>       and decision rules should be seperate.

OK. I've been doing everything looking how ebt_mark.c is written. I thought 
about dropping 
it (iptables has nothing like this and works), but I havent't been sure if I 
should.

> > diff -Nur linux-2.6.17.orig/net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig 
> > linux-2.6.17/net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig
> > --- linux-2.6.17.orig/net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig  2006-06-18 
> > 03:49:35.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.17/net/bridge/netfilter/Kconfig       2006-06-28 
> > 20:48:27.000000000 
> > +0200
> > @@ -165,6 +165,15 @@
> > 
> >       To compile it as a module, choose M here.  If unsure, say N.
> > 
> > +config BRIDGE_EBT_VLAN_T
> > +   tristate "ebt: vlan target support"
> > +   depends on BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES
> > +   help
> > +     This option adds the vlan target.
> > +
> > +     To compile it as a module, choose M here.  If unsure, say N.
> > +
> > +
> 
> Please put your nice explanations "to change vlan ids in fly" from your email 
> here.

OK.

> I cannot comment on rest of the patch and hope other people will do :-)

I hope they do, too. Thanks. :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to