On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:10:26PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> On 03/21/2017 04:07 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:04:29PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> >>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/gtp.h b/include/uapi/linux/gtp.h
> >>index 72a04a0..c51ebb0 100644
> >>--- a/include/uapi/linux/gtp.h
> >>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/gtp.h
> >>@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ enum gtp_attrs {
> >>    GTPA_LINK,
> >>    GTPA_VERSION,
> >>    GTPA_TID,       /* for GTPv0 only */
> >>-   GTPA_SGSN_ADDRESS,
> >>+   GTPA_PEER_ADDRESS,      /* Remote GSN peer, either SGSN or GGSN */
> >We need here:
> >
> >#define GTPA_SGSN_ADDRESS GTPA_PEER_ADDRESS
> >
> >for backward compatibility. Anything that is exposed through uapi
> >cannot be changed.
> 
> Yes... look a couple of lines further down...
> 
> >>    GTPA_MS_ADDRESS,
> >>    GTPA_FLOW,
> >>    GTPA_NET_NS_FD,
> >>@@ -29,5 +29,6 @@ enum gtp_attrs {
> >>    __GTPA_MAX,
> >>  };
> >>  #define GTPA_MAX (__GTPA_MAX + 1)
> >>+#define GTPA_SGSN_ADDRESS GTPA_PEER_ADDRESS /* maintain legacy attr name */
> 
> ^^^^... there it is! :)

Oh right!

Please, move it there to the enum definition, just after the new
GTPA_PEER_ADDRESS. We usually do this in other areas of the networking
code.

You also have to resubmit indicating net-next in your patch subject,
ie.  [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] gtp: rename SGSN netlink attribute

David usually requests that you explicitly indicate the target tree in
some way.

Thanks!

Reply via email to