It looks like a typo to assign a return code to a variable which is not
used. Found due to a compiler warning:

net/nfc/netlink.c: In function ‘nfc_genl_activate_target’:
net/nfc/netlink.c:903:6: warning: variable ‘rc’ set but not used 
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  int rc;
        ^~

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
---
 net/nfc/netlink.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/nfc/netlink.c b/net/nfc/netlink.c
index 03f3d5c7beb8..03be522127ec 100644
--- a/net/nfc/netlink.c
+++ b/net/nfc/netlink.c
@@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ static int nfc_genl_activate_target(struct sk_buff *skb, 
struct genl_info *info)
        rc = nfc_activate_target(dev, target_idx, protocol);
 
        nfc_put_device(dev);
-       return 0;
+       return rc;
 }
 
 static int nfc_genl_dep_link_up(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
-- 
2.11.0

Reply via email to