From: "Michael Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:22:11 -0700
> John W. Linville wrote: > > > Obviously it is between you and Dave to decide what is best. We are > > carrying this patch in RHEL4 at the moment, so I didn't want to hold > > it back from upstream. If you think you have a better solution then > > "it's on you"... :-) > > Since 2.6.18 already has the recovery logic in place, we can probably > holdoff merging this patch upstream. I think that since we do have a proof positive report, and well documented success of the fix, we should add the fix even though we have the fallback thing to take care of it. This is how we were going to use the fall-back code, to make the the chipset blacklist more robust yet still allow the user's machine to work meanwhile. Here, we have enough information to add the blacklist entry safely. What do you think? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
