David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Not really. The flag code last major change was to do the dormant >> > stuff that HDLC wanted. >> >> ... and where the maintainer doesn't seem to care to use it now that the >> infrastructure is there. Sigh.
This is very different from what I proposed and doesn't fit very well. We've been discussing this to death. > Yes, this is very unfortunate. They made the loudest noise about > wanting the change, yet they aren't even responsible enough to submit > the HDLC patches necessary to make use of it. This was apparently > needed to fix HDLC, so where's the followup? I'm still thinking how to use it safely. Should it be implemented sanely, things would be different. > This is why the HDLC "maintainers" shouldn't be surprised if we flat > out ignore them the next time they complain about anything. You are correct - some time ago, I was really surprised. Now, especially having received that private mail from you - the situation is obvious. I'm a single developer BTW. -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
