On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 14:59 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> > > It seems the code does not match the intent. > > This broke packetdrill, and probably other programs. > > Fixes: 6c7c98bad488 ("sock: avoid dirtying sk_stamp, if possible") > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> > Cc: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> > --- > include/net/sock.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h > index > 8e53158a7d957ea2a480cc449606dca2480b1259..66349e49d468646ce724485bb8e74952825f0d6c > 100644 > --- a/include/net/sock.h > +++ b/include/net/sock.h > @@ -2250,7 +2250,7 @@ static inline void sock_recv_ts_and_drops(struct msghdr > *msg, struct sock *sk, > > if (sk->sk_flags & FLAGS_TS_OR_DROPS || sk->sk_tsflags & TSFLAGS_ANY) > __sock_recv_ts_and_drops(msg, sk, skb); > - else if (unlikely(sk->sk_flags & SOCK_TIMESTAMP)) > + else if (unlikely(sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP))) > sk->sk_stamp = skb->tstamp; > else if (unlikely(sk->sk_stamp == SK_DEFAULT_STAMP)) > sk->sk_stamp = 0; >
Oh, my bad! Thanks Eric for fixing this. Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com>