On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 18:13 -0400, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Why not replace yield with msleep(1) which gets rid of the inversion > issues?
That's fine, just not super efficient, if that matters. -Mike
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 18:13 -0400, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Why not replace yield with msleep(1) which gets rid of the inversion > issues?
That's fine, just not super efficient, if that matters. -Mike