On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:14:37PM -0700, R. Parameswaran wrote: > > The MTU overhead calculation in L2TP device set-up > merged via commit b784e7ebfce8cfb16c6f95e14e8532d0768ab7ff > needs to be adjusted to lock the tunnel socket while > referencing the sub-data structures to derive the > socket's IP overhead.
Thanks. Tested-by: Guillaume Nault <g.na...@alphalink.fr> BTW, you don't need to add "v1" for the first version of a patch. There's also no need for numbering pathes when there's only one in the series. And we normally prefix the commit message with "<subsystem>: ". For this patch, your subject would look like " [PATCH net-next] l2tp: ...". Also, you could have added a "Reported-by:" tag (I don't really mind in this case, but that's good practice).
