> -----Original Message----- > From: Miroslav Lichvar [mailto:mlich...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:00 AM > > Oh, I see. I was struggling to find a good name for this option. > > > The name for this option is therefore not very descriptive. Perhaps > > SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_BOTH_SW_HW. > > Simultaneous SW/HW timestamping was already possible for incoming > packets. Maybe _OPT_TX_SWHW would be better? >
This sounds more accurate to me. Thanks, Jake > -- > Miroslav Lichvar
