> On Apr 13, 2017, at 6:18 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> +
> +static void __vsock_deliver_tap(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct vsock_tap *tmp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp, &vsock_tap_all, list) {
> + ret = __vsock_deliver_tap_skb(skb, tmp->dev);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + consume_skb(skb);
It looks like the caller will allocate the skb regardless of whether
vsock_tap_all is empty, so shouldn’t the skb be consumed in vsock_deliver_tap?
> +}
> +
> +void vsock_deliver_tap(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + if (unlikely(!list_empty(&vsock_tap_all)))
> + __vsock_deliver_tap(skb);
> +
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_deliver_tap);
> --
> 2.9.3
>
