Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> diff -Nurp  a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> --- a/net/core/sock.c   2006-07-06 09:08:24.000000000 +0100
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c   2006-07-14 10:17:50.000000000 +0100
> @@ -479,7 +479,12 @@ set_rcvbuf:
>                        break;
> 
>                case SO_NO_CHECK:
> -                       sk->sk_no_check = valbool;
> +                       /* UDP-Lite (RFC 3828) mandates checksumming,
> +                        * hence user must not enable this option.   */
> +                       if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_UDPLITE)
> +                               ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +                       else
> +                           sk->sk_no_check = valbool;

Please don't add protocol-specific stuff to generic functions.  In this
case why don't you just ignore sk_no_check for UDPLITE as we do for TCP?

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to