On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 22:58 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> For what it is worth, there was a patch for this posted back
> in January.  It stirred-up a kerfluffle, so it never got merged.
> FWIW, it touches on 802.11e QoS and multiple TX queues -- my personal
> favorite wireless subject...NOT!
> 
> The thread is available here (first post not connected to follow-up
> thread for some reason):
> 
>       http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=113809246102858&w=2
>       http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=113814103024576&w=2
> 
> Given that half a year has passed, does anyone have any better ideas
> now?  Should I merge the patch?  Or is the cure worse than the disease?

The patch from Stefan Rompf in the second link has already been merged.
The first one was already merged (with slightly difference). We can just
remove the ieee80211 warning now.

[PATCH] ieee80211: remove ieee80211_tx() is_queue_full warning

Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

--- a/net/ieee80211/ieee80211_tx.c
+++ b/net/ieee80211/ieee80211_tx.c
@@ -533,13 +533,6 @@ int ieee80211_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, 
                        return 0;
                }
 
-               if (ret == NETDEV_TX_BUSY) {
-                       printk(KERN_ERR "%s: NETDEV_TX_BUSY returned; "
-                              "driver should report queue full via "
-                              "ieee_device->is_queue_full.\n",
-                              ieee->dev->name);
-               }
-
                ieee80211_txb_free(txb);
        }
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to