Hi Andrew,

Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> writes:

>  static int mv88e6xxx_phy_page_get(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int phy, u8 
> page)
>  {
> -     if (!mv88e6xxx_has(chip, MV88E6XXX_FLAG_PHY_PAGE))
> -             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
>       return mv88e6xxx_phy_write(chip, phy, PHY_PAGE, page);
>  }
>  
> @@ -300,8 +298,8 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_phy_page_put(struct mv88e6xxx_chip 
> *chip, int phy)
>       }
>  }
>  
> -static int mv88e6xxx_phy_page_read(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int phy,
> -                                u8 page, int reg, u16 *val)
> +int mv88e6xxx_phy_page_read(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int phy,
> +                         u8 page, int reg, u16 *val)
>  {
>       int err;
>  
> @@ -318,8 +316,8 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_phy_page_read(struct mv88e6xxx_chip 
> *chip, int phy,
>       return err;
>  }
>  
> -static int mv88e6xxx_phy_page_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int phy,
> -                                 u8 page, int reg, u16 val)
> +int mv88e6xxx_phy_page_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int phy,
> +                          u8 page, int reg, u16 val)

Hum, this patch does a bit too much... Please at least add a first one
providing phy.[ch] for the PHY Registers related functions, then add the
serdes_power operation.

> +#define MV88E6XXX_FLAG_G1_ATU_FID    BIT_ULL(MV88E6XXX_CAP_G1_ATU_FID)

This seems to be added back by mistake.

> @@ -889,6 +868,9 @@ struct mv88e6xxx_ops {
>                          struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry);
>       int (*vtu_loadpurge)(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
>                            struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry);
> +
> +     /* Power on/off a SERDES interface */
> +     int (*serdes_power)(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, bool on);
>  };

While the get_* and set_* ops are an exception, we might want to sort
that at least before the vtu_* ops. But that is a minor comment.

> +#define MV88E6352_ADDR_SERDES                0x0f
> +#define MV88E6352_SERDES_PAGE_FIBER  0x01

Why not moving this in the serdes.h header with the others?


Thank you,

      Vivien

Reply via email to