On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 04:39:53PM +0200, Antony Antony wrote:
> During xfrm migration replay and preplay sequence numbers are not 
> copied from the previous state. 
> 
> Here is tcpdump output showing the problem.
> 10.0.10.46 is running vanilla kernel, IKE/IPsec responder.
> After the migration it sent wrong sequence number, reset to 1.
> The migration is from 10.0.0.52 to 10.0.0.53.
> 
> IP 10.0.0.52.4500 > 10.0.10.46.4500: UDP-encap: 
> ESP(spi=0x43ef462d,seq=0x7cf), length 136
> IP 10.0.10.46.4500 > 10.0.0.52.4500: UDP-encap: 
> ESP(spi=0xca1c282d,seq=0x7cf), length 136
> IP 10.0.0.52.4500 > 10.0.10.46.4500: UDP-encap: 
> ESP(spi=0x43ef462d,seq=0x7d0), length 136
> IP 10.0.10.46.4500 > 10.0.0.52.4500: UDP-encap: 
> ESP(spi=0xca1c282d,seq=0x7d0), length 136
> 
> IP 10.0.0.53.4500 > 10.0.10.46.4500: NONESP-encap: isakmp: child_sa  inf2[I]
> IP 10.0.10.46.4500 > 10.0.0.53.4500: NONESP-encap: isakmp: child_sa  inf2[R]
> IP 10.0.0.53.4500 > 10.0.10.46.4500: NONESP-encap: isakmp: child_sa  inf2[I]
> IP 10.0.10.46.4500 > 10.0.0.53.4500: NONESP-encap: isakmp: child_sa  inf2[R]
> 
> IP 10.0.0.53.4500 > 10.0.10.46.4500: UDP-encap: 
> ESP(spi=0x43ef462d,seq=0x7d1), length 136
> 
> NOTE: next sequence is wrong 0x1
> 
> IP 10.0.10.46.4500 > 10.0.0.53.4500: UDP-encap: ESP(spi=0xca1c282d,seq=0x1), 
> length 136
> IP 10.0.0.53.4500 > 10.0.10.46.4500: UDP-encap: 
> ESP(spi=0x43ef462d,seq=0x7d2), length 136
> IP 10.0.10.46.4500 > 10.0.0.53.4500: UDP-encap: ESP(spi=0xca1c282d,seq=0x2), 
> length 136
> 
> The attached patch fix it by copying replay and preplay.

The patch looks ok, but please do a v2 and put the above
informations into the commit message. This is usefull
information that we would loose otherwise.

Thanks!

Reply via email to