On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:08:11 -0400
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Stephen!
>
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 10:20 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > So how about these wrappers.
>
> > +static inline void netdev_set_pdev(struct net_device *dev, struct device
> > *pdev)
> > +{
> > + dev->class_dev.dev = pdev;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct device *netdev_get_pdev(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + return dev->class_dev.dev;
> > +}
>
> The positive effect of a macro is that if would allow MadWifi to prepare
> in advance by testing if GET_NETDEV_DEV is defined.
>
> The functions may or may not be useful for the code in the kernel, but
> I'll not be able to prepare MadWifi unless I know the kernel version in
> which they will appear.
>
> Considering the drivers that are already in the kernel, you may prefer
> to have a more high-level function that would clone the network device
> by copying most of the net_device structure. I think netdev_get_pdev()
> would be mostly used for such cloning if implemented.
>
What is the wireless tree using for this?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
