At 2017-05-23 11:02:20, "David Miller" <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: >From: gfree.w...@vip.163.com >Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 08:45:11 +0800 > >> From: Gao Feng <gfree.w...@vip.163.com> >> >> When the new RFS table size specified by sysctl equals the old one, >> there is nothing changed actually. So it is unnecessary to reset the >> RFS table entris. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <gfree.w...@vip.163.com> > >It seems like an intentional feature to be able to reset the >table by simply writing the same value to the sysfs knob. > >I'm not applying this, sorry.
It is ok. I just thought maybe it was used to reset, but I didn't find any comment and tips by google. Regards Feng
