On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 12:48 -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 15:24:46 -0700 > > > Add a FLAG_NO_CHALLENGE_ACK so that tcp_rcv_state_process() > > can choose to send a challenge ACK and discard the packet instead > > of wrongly change socket state. > > Applied, but the tests end up being double-negatives so it might > have been easier to understand if the flag was a positive rather > than a negative value.
I thought of this (and was in fact one of the patch I sent for internal review at Google), but this was changing all tcp_ack() calls instead of a single one ? Or maybe I am missing some easier way ? Thanks
