On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote:
> Avoids reimplementation of DMI matching in stmmac_pci_find_phy_addr.

>  struct stmmac_pci_dmi_data {
> -       const char *name;
> -       const char *asset_tag;
> -       unsigned int func;
> +       int func;
>         int phy_addr;
>  };

Can we use the following instead:

struct stmmac_pci_dmi_data {
       unsigned int *func;
       int *phy_addr;
       size_t nfuncs;
};

or something like

struct stmmac_pci_func_data {
       unsigned int func;
       int phy_addr;
};

struct stmmac_pci_dmi_data {
    struct stmmac_pci_func_data *func;
    size_t nfuncs;
};

(Latter would be better since it allows to use ARRAY_SIZE() and less
error prone for possible asymmetrical amount of values in the former)

?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Reply via email to