Hello.

Jeff Garzik wrote:

It's generally not a good idea to call request_region() on an address returned by pci_iomap(), even less so on a MMIO address. And there was absolutely no point in claiming the region already claimed by the PCI core, especially with the same PCI generic owner's name. As this is the only case of the must_free_region flag being set, this flag may go away as well...

Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I agree you have identified a bug, but this is not a solution.

The current driver bug is that it calls request_region() potentially on an MMIO address, but the solution is _not_ to completely avoid reserving the resource.

It's not even a MMIO/PIO address anymore after pci_iomap() -- it either went thru ioremap() or ioport_map() which both change the mapping from the physical to the virtual address (or some equivalent of it for I/O ports).

Yes. _Obviously_ you must reserve the resource passed to pci_iomap/ioremap, not the cookie returned by such.

What somewhat puzzled me is the words "Cardbus drivers already allocate for us" in the current driver's vortex_probe1(). What extra drivers, and why should they call request_region() for us? :-/

The region registered with the PCI core, but _not_ claimed by anyone. Someone still needs to either call pci_{request,release}_regions() or request_[mem_]region() to indicate that the resource is reserved.

   Sigh, it seems I've missed that difference. So, I'll recast...

IMO it would be easiest to do pci_{request,release}_regions() in the PCI-only code. I believe this matches up well with the existing EISA-specific code, which also performs request_region().

Ugh, I've looked at vortex_remove_one() and found another buglet: they're trying to reset the chip there... after calling pci_disable_device(). Guess whether they really reset anything. I wonder whether it's accpetable for this fix to be put in the same patch...

    Jeff

WBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to