On 06/06/17 00:30, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Add NULL check before dereferencing pointer _p_ inside br_afspec().
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1401872
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> index 1e63ec4..ad85a9c 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ int br_setlink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlmsghdr
> *nlh, u16 flags)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (afspec) {
> + if (p && afspec) {
> err = br_afspec((struct net_bridge *)netdev_priv(dev), p,
> afspec, RTM_SETLINK);
> }
>
While I see a possible issue with the new bridge tunnel code (+CC Roopa), this
is
the wrong fix because there are legitimate use cases where p is null and
br_afspec
is called.
We need to change the p->flags check in br_afspec()'s
IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_TUNNEL_INFO case
to check for a NULL p first.
Thanks for the report!
