On 25.06.2017 08:21, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 09:46:24AM +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote:
>> When an administratively set MAC was previously set and should now be
>> switched back to 00:00:00:00:00:00 the pf_set_mac flag did not get
>> toggled back to false.
>> As a result VFs were still treated as if an administratively set MAC was
>> present.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassm...@kpanic.de>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c 
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
>> index ecbe40e..af0ff61 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
>> @@ -2764,7 +2764,6 @@ int i40e_ndo_set_vf_mac(struct net_device *netdev, int 
>> vf_id, u8 *mac)
>>
>>      spin_unlock_bh(&vsi->mac_filter_hash_lock);
>>
>> -    dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "Setting MAC %pM on VF %d\n", mac, vf_id);
>>      /* program mac filter */
>>      if (i40e_sync_vsi_filters(vsi)) {
>>              dev_err(&pf->pdev->dev, "Unable to program ucast filters\n");
>> @@ -2772,7 +2771,16 @@ int i40e_ndo_set_vf_mac(struct net_device *netdev, 
>> int vf_id, u8 *mac)
>>              goto error_param;
>>      }
>>      ether_addr_copy(vf->default_lan_addr.addr, mac);
>> -    vf->pf_set_mac = true;
>> +
>> +    if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac)) {
>> +            vf->pf_set_mac = false;
>> +            dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "Removing MAC on VF %d\n", vf_id);
>> +    } else {
>> +            vf->pf_set_mac = true;
>> +            dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "Setting MAC %pM on VF %d\n",
>> +                     mac, vf_id);
>> +    }
>> +
> 
> It can be removed to be one line change, because I'm not sure that
> dev_info prints are necessary here.
> +     vf->pf_set_mac = is_zero_ether_addr(mac);
> 
> Thanks

This matches ixgbe behavior, so I'd prefer to keep it this way.
Thanks!

  Stefan

Reply via email to