On 10-07-17 19:02, Russell Joyce wrote: >> 1) I think most of it should be some cfg80211 shareable code. > > I’m not sure exactly what you mean by this, could you please clarify?
What I think Rafał is saying is that it would be better to have this code in cfg80211 so other drivers including mac80211 could use it. >> 2) This "rxtx" while surely present in other places sounds like a >> workaround for LED subsystem limitation. Maybe it's time to finally >> rework LED triggers. > > I agree that it’s not an ideal way to do things, but I couldn’t think of a > better alternative. I think that having a combined trigger is useful though, > for > situations like using the single LED on a Raspberry Pi to show Wi-Fi activity. Indeed. However, the LED subsystem could/should(?) take care of mapping "rx" and "tx" triggers to the same LED. I am happy to comment on your patch, but maybe you can first take a look at the suggestion Rafał made above. Regards, Arend
