On 06-08-02 17:58 John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:43:31PM +0200, Ulrich Kunitz wrote: > > From: Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > We'll be needing these at some point... > > This one doesn't really seem like a fix. But since the later fixes > seem to depend on it, I guess it makes sense to take it. > > I just didn't want you to think I wasn't looking... :-)
John, you are absolutely right. The patch is needed, because the patch sequence would break without it. Would it be acceptable if I hint on such "bridge" patches in the futture or should we create a clean patch sequence? The latter would require us to rewrite patches manually. BTW we will have a greater number of patches for 2.6.19 (around 30), which supports more devices and also cleans stuff. Some work is however still required. Regards, Uli -- Uli Kunitz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
