Hi David, On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 01:00:26PM -0600, David Ahern wrote: > >> I don't think so. If I add a prohibit route and use the fibmatch > >> attribute, I want to see the route from the FIB that was matched. > > > > > > yes, exactly. wouldn't 'rt != net->ipv6.ip6_prohibit_entry' above let > > it fall through to the route fill code ? > > > > ah...but i guess you are saying that they will have rt6_info's of > > their own and will not match. got it. ack. > > > > This: > > diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c > index 4d30c96a819d..24de81c804c2 100644 > --- a/net/ipv6/route.c > +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c > @@ -3637,11 +3637,6 @@ static int inet6_rtm_getroute(struct sk_buff > *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, > dst = ip6_route_lookup(net, &fl6, 0); > > rt = container_of(dst, struct rt6_info, dst); > - if (rt->dst.error) { > - err = rt->dst.error; > - ip6_rt_put(rt); > - goto errout; > - } > > if (rt == net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry) { > err = rt->dst.error; > > Puts back the original behavior. In that case, only rt == null_entry > drops to the error path which is correct. All other rt values will drop > to rt6_fill_node and return rt data.
Thanks for your explains. Now I know where I made the mistake. I mis-looked FR_ACT_UNREACHABLE to RTN_UNREACHABLE and thought we return rt = net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry in fib6_rule_action(). With you help I know we just set rt->dst.error to -EACCES for prohibit entry in ip6_route_info_create. So remove the rt->dst.error check is enought. Thanks Hangbin