ila_csum_name2mode() returning -1 on error but being declared as returning __u8 doesn't make much sense. Change the code to correctly detect this issue. Checking for __u8 overruns shouldn't be necessary though since ila_csum_name2mode() return values are well-defined.
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <p...@nwl.cc> --- ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c b/ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c index 5c0c7d110d23e..398ab5e077ed8 100644 --- a/ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c +++ b/ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static char *ila_csum_mode2name(__u8 csum_mode) } } -static __u8 ila_csum_name2mode(char *name) +static int ila_csum_name2mode(char *name) { if (strcmp(name, "adj-transport") == 0) return ILA_CSUM_ADJUST_TRANSPORT; @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static int parse_encap_ila(struct rtattr *rta, size_t len, while (argc > 0) { if (strcmp(*argv, "csum-mode") == 0) { - __u8 csum_mode; + int csum_mode; NEXT_ARG(); @@ -526,7 +526,8 @@ static int parse_encap_ila(struct rtattr *rta, size_t len, invarg("\"csum-mode\" value is invalid\n", *argv); - rta_addattr8(rta, 1024, ILA_ATTR_CSUM_MODE, csum_mode); + rta_addattr8(rta, 1024, ILA_ATTR_CSUM_MODE, + (__u8)csum_mode); argc--; argv++; } else { -- 2.13.1