> On 2017年8月29日, at 上午7:19, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > > From: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishu...@cmss.chinamobile.com> > Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 15:24:45 +0800 > >> In be_tx_compl_process, frag_index declared as u32, so it's better to >> declare last_index as u32 also. >> >> CC: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com> >> Fixes: b0fd2eb28bd4 ("be2net: Declare some u16 fields as u32 to improve >> performance") >> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishu...@cmss.chinamobile.com> > > That is not a legitimate reason for making this change. > >> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ struct be_tx_stats { >> /* Structure to hold some data of interest obtained from a TX CQE */ >> struct be_tx_compl_info { >> u8 status; /* Completion status */ >> - u16 end_index; /* Completed TXQ Index */ >> + u32 end_index; /* Completed TXQ Index */ >> }; >> >> struct be_tx_obj { > > The ->end_index comes solely from: > > txcp->end_index = GET_TX_COMPL_BITS(wrb_index, compl); > > Which is precisely a 16-bit value. > > I'm not applying this, sorry. >
Hi David, The GET_TX_COMPL_BITS comes from amap_get which also returns a 32-bit value: 6 static inline u32 amap_get(void *ptr, u32 dw_offset, u32 mask, u32 offset) 5 { 4 u32 *dw = (u32 *) ptr; 3 return mask & (*(dw + dw_offset) >> offset); 2 } 1 869 #define AMAP_GET_BITS(_struct, field, ptr) \ 1 amap_get(ptr, \ 2 offsetof(_struct, field)/32, \ 3 amap_mask(sizeof(((_struct *)0)->field)), \ 4 AMAP_BIT_OFFSET(_struct, field))