From: Ahmed Abdelsalam <amsala...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:50:37 +0200
> IPv6 packet may carry more than one extension header, and IPv6 nodes must > accept and attempt to process extension headers in any order and occurring > any number of times in the same packet. Hence, there should be no > assumption that Segment Routing extension header is to appear immediately > after the IPv6 header. > > Moreover, section 4.1 of RFC 8200 gives a recommendation on the order of > appearance of those extension headers within an IPv6 packet. According to > this recommendation, Segment Routing extension header should appear after > Hop-by-Hop and Destination Options headers (if they present). > > This patch fixes the get_srh(), so it gets the segment routing header > regardless of its position in the chain of the extension headers in IPv6 > packet, and makes sure that the IPv6 routing extension header is of Type 4. > > Signed-off-by: Ahmed Abdelsalam <amsala...@gmail.com> Applied.
