On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 14:24 +0000, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter wrote: > On 8/25/17 5:19 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > >> > >> Tested with Intel XL710 NIC with Cisco 3172 switch. > >> > >> It would be even slightly better if the irqbalance service is turned > >> off outside. > > > > Yes, if you don't turn-off (kill) irqbalance it will move around the > > IRQs behind your back... > > Or you can use the --banirq option to irqbalance to ignore your device's > interrupts as targets for balancing.
Oh, I wasn't aware of this parameter. I will be glad to have try later. Meanwhile, in my test above, the irqbalance service just affect result very little. > > Cheers, > -PJ
