On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 05:29:54PM -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On 8/7/06, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 15:01:09 +0200
> >
> >> All caller of netdev_alloc_skb need to assign skb->dev shortly
> >> afterwards.  Move it into common code.
> >>
> >> I also had to fixup a little bit of the surrounding control flow in
> >> e1000 - it was just too convoluted.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Since the e1000 change is non-trivial I'm not going to bypass
> >the driver author on it, sorry.
> >
> >What I did do was put the netdev_alloc_skb() change into my
> >tree, and since I'm co-author of the tg3 driver I'll apply
> >that bit too.
> >
> >The e1000 bit will need to go through the e1000 maintainers.
> 
> Thank you, I'll take a look at this tomorrow, as I need to digest the
> patch in context.

Did you get a chance to look at it?  For your conveniance here's just
the e1000 bits, without the hunks Dave has commited already:


Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c       2006-08-04 
19:06:09.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c    2006-08-05 14:18:32.000000000 
+0200
@@ -3711,7 +3711,6 @@
                            netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, length + NET_IP_ALIGN);
                        if (new_skb) {
                                skb_reserve(new_skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
-                               new_skb->dev = netdev;
                                memcpy(new_skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN,
                                       skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN,
                                       length + NET_IP_ALIGN);
@@ -3978,13 +3977,13 @@
        buffer_info = &rx_ring->buffer_info[i];
 
        while (cleaned_count--) {
-               if (!(skb = buffer_info->skb))
-                       skb = netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, bufsz);
-               else {
+               skb = buffer_info->skb;
+               if (skb) {
                        skb_trim(skb, 0);
                        goto map_skb;
                }
 
+               skb = netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, bufsz);
                if (unlikely(!skb)) {
                        /* Better luck next round */
                        adapter->alloc_rx_buff_failed++;
@@ -4009,10 +4008,10 @@
                                dev_kfree_skb(skb);
                                dev_kfree_skb(oldskb);
                                break; /* while !buffer_info->skb */
-                       } else {
-                               /* Use new allocation */
-                               dev_kfree_skb(oldskb);
                        }
+
+                       /* Use new allocation */
+                       dev_kfree_skb(oldskb);
                }
                /* Make buffer alignment 2 beyond a 16 byte boundary
                 * this will result in a 16 byte aligned IP header after
@@ -4020,8 +4019,6 @@
                 */
                skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
 
-               skb->dev = netdev;
-
                buffer_info->skb = skb;
                buffer_info->length = adapter->rx_buffer_len;
 map_skb:
@@ -4135,8 +4132,6 @@
                 */
                skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
 
-               skb->dev = netdev;
-
                buffer_info->skb = skb;
                buffer_info->length = adapter->rx_ps_bsize0;
                buffer_info->dma = pci_map_single(pdev, skb->data,
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to