On Sun, 2017-09-17 at 16:27 +0000, Jon Maloy wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Meyer [mailto:tho...@m3y3r.de]
[]
> > What about the other binary search implementation in the same file? Should
> > I try to convert it it will it get NAKed for performance reasons too?
> 
> The searches for inserting and removing publications is less time critical,
> so that would be ok with me.
> If you have any more general interest in improving the code in this file
> (which is needed) it would also be appreciated.

Perhaps using an rbtree would be an improvement.

Reply via email to